Design-Based Finite-Sample Analysis for Regression Adjustment

In randomized experiments, regression adjustment can improve the precision of average treatment effect (ATE) estimation using covariates without requiring a correctly specified outcome model. Although well studied in low-dimensional settings, its behavior in high-dimensional regimes, where the number of covariates $p$ may exceed the number of observations $n$, remains underexplored. Moreover, existing analyses are largely asymptotic, providing limited guidance for finite-sample inference. We develop a design-based, non-asymptotic framework for analyzing the regression-adjusted ATE estimator under complete randomization. This yields finite-sample-valid confidence intervals with explicit, instance-adaptive widths, even when $p > n$. While these intervals rely on oracle (population-level) quantities, we also outline data-driven envelopes computable from observed data. Our approach hinges on a refined swap sensitivity analysis of an estimator: stochastic fluctuation is controlled via a variance-adaptive Doob martingale and Freedman's inequality, and design bias is bounded by Stein's method of exchangeable pairs. The analysis elucidates how covariate geometry governs concentration and bias of the adjusted estimator, suggesting when and how regression adjustment can be effective.